Justin Baldoni’s Lawyer Fires Again at Blake Vigorous’s Movement to Dismiss

Justin Baldoni‘s lawyer is firing again at Blake Vigorous‘s try to chop herself out of the continued authorized drama surrounding the movie, “It Ends with Us.”

Bryan Freedman tells TMZ … “Ms. Vigorous’s latest movement to dismiss herself from the self-concocted catastrophe she initiated is without doubt one of the most abhorrent examples of abusing our authorized system.”

Freedman says “stringent guidelines are put into place to guard the harmless and permit people to rightfully defend themselves,” whereas noting “legal guidelines usually are not meant to be twisted and curated by privileged elites to suit their very own private agenda.”

Earlier at the moment … TMZ broke the story that Blake filed her movement to dismiss, saying Baldoni violated the regulation by submitting his personal lawsuit for the needs of revenge.

Blake says Baldoni filed his defamation swimsuit in opposition to her, her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and her publicist, Leslie Sloane, proper after she filed her lawsuit in opposition to him. In her swimsuit, Blake accused Justin of sexually harassing her, and launching a smear marketing campaign in the course of the filming of the flick. As , Baldoni was the film’s director and Blake’s costar.

As we reported Wednesday … Reynolds was first to file a movement to be dismissed from Baldoni’s swimsuit, claiming Justin labeled him a “predator.” However, Reynolds argued, it is not defamation as a result of he believes the assertion to be true, and Justin must show in any other case.

In his assertion to TMZ, Freedman reiterated … “As we mentioned yesterday in response to Mr. Reynolds’ identical cowardly measures, we are going to proceed to carry Ms. Vigorous accountable for her actions of pure malice which embody falsely accusing my purchasers of harassment and retaliation.”

Freedman summed it up by saying Blake’s “fantastical claims shall be swiftly debunked as discovery strikes ahead, simply disproved with precise, evidentiary proof.”