After months of delays, a listening to began Tuesday to determine whether or not Erik and Lyle Menendez ought to get an opportunity at freedom after serving almost 30 years in jail for the double homicide of their mother and father.
A Los Angeles choose is presiding over the resentencing listening to that’s anticipated to final two days. If he shortens their sentences, the brothers would nonetheless want approval from the state’s parole board to get out of jail. They may then probably go free on time served.
This mix of two reserving pictures supplied by the California Division of Corrections exhibits Erik Menendez, left, and Lyle Menendez.
California Dept. of Corrections through AP, File
They had been sentenced in 1996 to life in jail with out the potential of parole for murdering their father, Jose Menendez, and mom, Kitty Menendez, of their Beverly Hills dwelling in 1989. The brothers had been 18 and 21 on the time of the killings. Whereas defence attorneys argued the brothers acted out of self-defence after years of sexual abuse by their father, prosecutors mentioned the brothers killed their mother and father for a multimillion-dollar inheritance.
As a consequence of wildfires within the LA space and disputes between LA prosecutors and defence attorneys, the hearings had been delayed for months.
The case has captured the general public’s consideration for many years — and final yr, the Netflix drama Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story and documentary The Menendez Brothers introduced new consideration to the case. Supporters of the brothers have flown in from throughout the nation to attend rallies and hearings prior to now few months.
Get breaking Nationwide information
For information impacting Canada and world wide, join breaking information alerts delivered on to you once they occur.
Listening to begins with testimony from a member of the family
The choose kicked off the listening to with a reminder to the packed courtroom that prosecutors should show that the brothers are at an “unreasonable threat” of committing critical and violent crimes if they’re launched.
The defence started by calling Ana Maria Baralt, a cousin of Erik and Lyle, who testified that the brothers have repeatedly expressed regret for his or her actions. “All of us, on either side of the household, imagine that 35 years is sufficient,” Baralt mentioned. “They’re universally forgiven by our household.”
Choose to rule on a lesser sentence
The resentencing listening to will centre on whether or not the brothers have been rehabilitated in jail and deserve a lesser sentence of fifty years to life. That might make them eligible for parole underneath California’s youthful offender regulation as a result of they dedicated the crime underneath the age of 26.
Their defence lawyer, Mark Geragos, mentioned in April he might ask the choose to scale back their expenses to manslaughter, probably permitting them to be instantly launched.
FILE – Erik Menendez (L) and his brother Lyle (R) pay attention throughout a pre-trial listening to, on December 29, 1992 in Los Angeles after the 2 pleaded harmless within the August 1989 shotgun deaths of their rich mother and father, Jose and Mary Louise Menendez of Beverly Hills, Calif.
Vince Bucci / AFP through Getty Pictures
Geragos mentioned final Friday that he plans to name a minimum of seven relations to testify on the hearings. As in earlier proceedings, the brothers will seem just about. It was unclear if they’ll testify.
Los Angeles County prosecutors can be arguing towards the resentencing. They are saying the brothers haven’t taken full accountability for the crime. Prosecutors will seemingly reference the preliminary findings from a forensic psychologist who checked out whether or not the brothers pose a threat to society if launched, an evaluation ordered by the state parole board. The admissibility of the leads to court docket have been a degree of competition for the 2 sides, as they haven’t been made public, however the choose mentioned final Friday that some components could be included.
Former district legal professional and household help resentencing
The earlier LA County District Legal professional, George Gascón, had opened the door to doable freedom for the brothers final fall by asking a choose to scale back their sentences. His workplace mentioned the case would’ve been dealt with in another way in the present day attributable to trendy understandings of sexual abuse and trauma, and the brothers’ rehabilitation over three many years in jail.
A resentencing petition laid out by Gascón focuses on the brothers’ accomplishments and rehabilitation. The brothers’ attorneys say their shoppers have labored exhausting to raised themselves and provides again to the jail neighborhood. The prolonged Menendez household, except for an uncle who died in March, has mentioned they totally forgive the brothers for what they did and wish them to be freed.
Since their conviction, the brothers have gotten an schooling, participated in self-help courses and began numerous help teams for his or her fellow inmates.
The brand new LA prosecutor modified course
The present district legal professional, Nathan Hochman, reversed course from Gascón and opposed the brothers’ resentencing.
Hochman’s workplace has mentioned it doesn’t imagine that the brothers had been sexually abused by their father.
Prosecutors additionally say the brothers haven’t admitted to mendacity throughout their trial.
Exterior the courthouse Tuesday morning, Hochman mentioned he believes the brothers are usually not prepared for resentencing as a result of “they haven’t come clear” about their crimes.
“Our place isn’t ‘no,’ it’s not ‘by no means,’ it’s ‘not but,’” Hochman mentioned. “They haven’t totally accepted accountability for all their felony conduct.”
Not too long ago, prosecutors cited the forensic psychologist’s evaluation that mentioned the brothers had lately damaged jail guidelines by smuggling cellphones inside, which Hochman argued demonstrated an lack of ability to control their very own conduct. It got here to the conclusion that they had been “reasonably extra seemingly” than others to interact in violence in the neighborhood, Hochman mentioned.
With Hochman in cost, prosecutors tried twice to withdraw their workplace’s resentencing petition. Los Angeles County Superior Courtroom Choose Michael Jesic dominated each instances that the resentencing hearings might proceed regardless of their opposition.
The choose might determine on the resentencing from the bench through the listening to or situation a written ruling later.
© 2025 The Canadian Press
