Justin Baldoni’s legal professionals have withdrawn a subpoena that was issued to Taylor Swift amid the It Ends With Us actor’s ongoing authorized battle with co-star Blake Full of life.
Swift, who’s shut mates with Full of life, had been talked about in reference to the continued authorized case between the co-stars when textual content exchanges had been revealed that included her title in Baldoni’s US$400-million defamation countersuit in opposition to Full of life and her husband Ryan Reynolds in January.
Legal professionals for Swift and Full of life beforehand filed motions to revoke the subpoena, issued earlier this month.
Full of life’s spokesperson beforehand stated that Baldoni had tried to subpoena the pop star as a witness within the case “designed” to make use of Swift’s “title to attract public curiosity.”
“We’re happy that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Events have withdrawn their harassing subpoenas to Taylor Swift and her regulation agency,” the spokesperson stated in an announcement to Selection on Might 22.
“We supported the efforts of Taylor’s workforce to quash these inappropriate subpoenas directed to her counsel and we’ll proceed to face up for any third social gathering who’s unjustly harassed or threatened within the course of.”
“The Baldoni and Wayfarer workforce have tried to place Taylor Swift, a lady who has been an inspiration for tens of thousands and thousands throughout the globe, on the middle of this case since day one,” Full of life’s spokesperson added.
“Confronted with having to justify themselves in federal courtroom, they folded. In some unspecified time in the future they may run out of distractions from the precise claims of sexual harassment and retaliation they’re going through,” the assertion concluded.
Because the authorized battle started, Baldoni’s authorized workforce has made textual content messages from Full of life and Reynolds public on a web site, titled The Lawsuit Data, created to assist defend him.
On the web site, printed in early February, Baldoni, 41, additionally shared an amended criticism in his case in opposition to Full of life, Reynolds, Full of life’s PR agency and the New York Instances, in addition to a 168-page doc, known as “Timeline of related occasions,” associated to the case and the manufacturing of the movie.
Get breaking Nationwide information
For information impacting Canada and world wide, join breaking information alerts delivered on to you after they occur.
The timeline contains emails and textual content messages that had been allegedly despatched main as much as and through the film’s filming.
Textual content messages between Full of life and Baldoni, the place she seemingly alludes to Swift as “one among her dragons,” had been launched in February. Swift and Full of life have been very shut mates since 2015 and the pop star is the godmother of Full of life’s kids.
In accordance to Selection, the subpoenas to Swift and her authorized workforce didn’t look like linked to these specific textual content messages.
Bryan Freedman, Baldoni’s lawyer, stated he was in search of proof that Full of life’s lawyer had threatened to launch textual content messages between Full of life and Swift until Swift issued an announcement of help for the Gossip Woman actor, in accordance with a courtroom submitting considered by the outlet. (International Information has not independently considered the doc.)
Freedman alleged that he obtained a voicemail on Feb. 14 from “an individual very carefully linked to Taylor Swift.” He declined to determine the individual however claimed that Full of life’s lawyer had demanded that the 35-year-old singer submit an announcement in help of Full of life on social media and warned that he might launch 10 years of textual content messages between the pair.
Freedman additionally claimed that Swift’s legal professionals accused Full of life’s legal professionals of extortion.
The unidentified individual additionally claimed that Full of life had instructed Swift to delete their textual content messages from a number of months earlier, in accordance with Freedman.
Freedman stated the subpoena was to acquire the allegedly extortionate dialog in a letter to Full of life’s lawyer.
Full of life’s legal professionals known as Freedman’s allegations “unequivocally and demonstrably false.”
Swift’s authorized workforce beforehand stated that if Swift was subpoenaed, she wouldn’t have any info related to the authorized dispute and shouldn’t be concerned within the case.
“Taylor Swift by no means set foot on the set of this film, she was not concerned in any casting or artistic choices, she didn’t rating the movie, she by no means noticed an edit or made any notes on the movie, she didn’t even see It Ends With Us till weeks after its public launch, and was travelling across the globe throughout 2023 and 2024 headlining the largest tour in historical past,” her spokesperson stated on Might 9.
Swift’s workforce stated her solely involvement within the movie was licensing a tune, which was My Tears Ricochet.
“Provided that her involvement was licensing a tune for the movie, which 19 different artists additionally did, this doc subpoena is designed to make use of Taylor Swift’s title to attract public curiosity by creating tabloid clickbait as an alternative of specializing in the information of the case,” the spokesperson stated.
Full of life’s authorized workforce launched an announcement after information of Swift’s potential involvement within the case unfold. It stated that Baldoni and his authorized workforce “proceed to show a case of sexual harassment and retaliation into leisure for the tabloids.”
“It is a very critical authorized matter, not Barnum & Bailey’s Circus,” the spokesperson stated. “The defendants proceed to publicly intimidate, bully, disgrace and assault girls’s rights and reputations.”
Baldoni and Full of life’s authorized trial is ready for March 2026 in New York Metropolis.
© 2025 International Information, a division of Corus Leisure Inc.
